Why didn't you see this on the news?

G.O.D · Post by **G.O.D** » 30-06-04, 12:22 am

See the funny thing is most liberals denyt the actually of global economics that shows that it takes YEARS for the economy to change the way it did for clinton, in other words Bush Sr. is the one who made the economic situation so good, billy just came in and rode the already good wave, and got credit for it, by simpletons.

I think it was Ronald Regean not Bush Sr. that started the economic wave.

Merideth · Post by **Merideth** » 30-06-04, 2:34 pm

I think it was Ronald Regean not Bush Sr. that started the economic wave.

yes, it did start with Reagan

jasynder · Post by **jasynder** » 30-06-04, 3:05 pm

true enough point being clinton had no stake in its success, but he gets credited by the liberals

Post by **CinnamonGirl** » 30-06-04, 3:13 pm

Post by **Sholix** » 01-07-04, 5:00 pm

That's kinda strange, coz according to J's thinking, Reagan would've gotten his start from the Pres a few terms before him.

So someone needs to do some research and see just who was Pres when we (the USA) went into our very first economic slump. AND what caused it.

G.O.D · Post by **G.O.D** » 01-07-04, 6:09 pm

Usually it takes a way to get out of a economic slump..so if you track wars it's not so hard who benefits from who's economy raises..