Kerry the Douchbag.

G.O.D · Post by **G.O.D** » 12-09-04, 10:58 pm

adj : characteristic of someone who employs terrorism (especially as a political weapon); "terrorist activity"; "terrorist state" n : a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities

Basically it means it doesn't mean use have to hijack planes and fly them into buildings to be a terrorist. I could strap a bomb on myself and blow myself up in school and I would be defined as a terrorist.

Devlin · Post by **Devlin** » 12-09-04, 11:08 pm

That is an act of terrorism, but the definition is correct.

If you are still in doubt that there are active terrorist networks very willing to re-create what happened with 9/11, here is a good site to help you be informed.

<a href='http://library.nps.navy.mil/home/tgp/tgpndx.htm' target='_blank'>http://library.nps.navy.mil/home/tgp/tgpndx.htm</a>

Post by **v0id** » 13-09-04, 12:10 am

woahhhh I bet googles gonna have a field day, feeding this back to the FBI

Jean Pool · Post by **Jean Pool** » 13-09-04, 2:46 am

and the cookies, my god the cooklies.

More than a bakesale.

Post by **v0id** » 15-09-04, 8:31 pm

<a href='http://www.communistsforkerry.com' target='_blank'>http://www.communistsforkerry.com</a>

G.O.D · Post by **G.O.D** » 18-09-04, 2:48 am

Terrorism are like weeds. They cannot be destroyed, only contained.

Also like my friend said "If someone's pissed they're going do something drastic. Whether it 's strapping a bomb and blowing themselves up or verballing bitching someone out".

I see Bush's war on terrorism just causing more terrorism..especially in the Middle East. And Osama and his network are still up and running. Rather I'd prefer that he make sure the countries safer. Yes, he has taken steps with Homeland security but there's bound to be something the government has overlooked. Something that the terrorist would find and use.

Devlin · Post by **Devlin** » 18-09-04, 4:50 am

That is as solid of an argument as a glass of water. War does not beget terrorism, sitting back and letting terrorist threaten our interests, as well as our freedom is another.Granted there are too many organizations to count , but us in conflict with terrorism causeing more is not the case, lets think on the big picture here, the silly bastards are gonna blow themselves up along with otherrs war or not. Its us going in and intrevening will eventually over the years erraticate these orginazations for good. You people are just in for a "quick fix" strap a bandaid on it through Kerry and its all good right? Your wrong for thinking that, I will tell you why. Say Kerry gets nominated, we start negotiateing with these guys. Then all of the sudden they will get the peicture everytime they want something all they have to do is blow something up, or usesome other act of terrorism as a negotiating tool , Piracy at its finest. On the other hand, stand our ground eventually the problem with terrorism will be a dead issue. But go ahead and get your "quick fix" you will find yourself as well asw the rest of the nation in the same shape we have always been in.

Jean Pool · Post by **Jean Pool** » 18-09-04, 5:58 am

You know, you do have the right to remain silent. Anything you say may and will be used against you.

jk jk

G.O.D · Post by **G.O.D** » 18-09-04, 11:52 am

It doesn't matter if Bush eventually eradicates terrorism. Because whenever someone wants to take an extreme side to make a point they're do what terrorists are doing now.

Now you may be able to eliminate organized terrorism, but you'll never be able to eliminate terrorism itself. What's to stop another Columbine? Or even what happened to Russia? I could go into the school and do the exact same thing and the US could never stop me.

Next, you really shouldn't make assumptions. I wouldn't vote Kerry or Bush. In my opinion this year the USA doesn't really have a good firm choice to say who's better for the country. One could say Bush because he's fighting to eradicate terrorism. But the other can say Kerry, cause all Bush is doing is causing problems in the Middle East. But in my opinion they are both bad for this country.

Jean Pool · Post by **Jean Pool** » 18-09-04, 6:18 pm

putin for president

Post by **v0id** » 18-09-04, 6:25 pm

putin for president

or that fellow with the gravy stain on his forehead

Jean Pool · Post by **Jean Pool** » 18-09-04, 8:47 pm

I thought it was wine.

Post by **v0id** » 18-09-04, 9:54 pm

I thought it was wine.

I think thats what Asylum seekers do .... a LOT

Jean Pool · Post by **Jean Pool** » 18-09-04, 10:02 pm

you mean political asylum seekers? as in refugees? or emigrees? I may join their ranks, as I plan to emigrate to UK for health reasons.